Categorieën
Aerosolen Corruptie Juridisch Media Tegenspraak Wetenschap

WHO bevraagd kwalificaties kritische wetenschappers. Nature study:

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02058-1

‘The WHO says it is paying attention to such concerns. It will “continue to examine everything that is emerging”, says Allegranzi. But last week, she questioned the qualifications of those driving the debate. “There is this movement, which made their voice very loud by publishing various position papers or opinion papers,” she says. “Why don’t we ask ourselves … why are these theories coming mainly from engineers, aerobiologists, and so on, whereas the majority of the clinical, infectious-diseases, epidemiology, public health, and infection-prevention and control people do not think exactly the same? Or they appreciate this evidence, but they don’t think that the role is so prominent?”Is the coronavirus airborne? Experts can’t agree

Morawska disputes this characterization. And the list of people who joined the commentary reveals 40 physicians, virologists and infectious-disease epidemiologists, along with at least 20 aerosol scientists who work directly on transmission of infectious agents.‘

Studie naar verspreiding door de lucht in slachthuis in Duitsland:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3654517

Geef een antwoord

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *